Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avatar migration to vitest #2589

Conversation

NishantSinghhhhh
Copy link
Contributor

@NishantSinghhhhh NishantSinghhhhh commented Dec 2, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Feature/Refactoring Avatar component

Issue Number : #2492

Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes

Snapshots/Videos:

Screencast.from.2024-12-02.18-44-06.webm

Summary

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
NO

Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Avatar component with optional name and customUrl properties for greater flexibility.
    • Introduced new testing scripts for the Vitest framework to improve testing capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the Avatar component to gracefully manage invalid inputs.
  • Documentation

    • Updated configuration files for TypeScript and Vitest to streamline the development and testing processes.
  • Chores

    • Updated various dependencies to their latest versions for improved performance and security.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several updates to the talawa-admin project, focusing on dependency management in package.json, enhancements to the Avatar component in Avatar.tsx, and the addition of a test suite for the Avatar component in Avatar.spec.tsx. Furthermore, it includes the establishment of a Vitest configuration file and modifications to the TypeScript configuration to exclude certain directories from compilation. New testing scripts for Vitest have also been added, reflecting a migration from Jest to Vitest for testing purposes.

Changes

File Change Summary
package.json Updated various dependencies and devDependencies, including version increments and downgrades for several packages, added new dependencies (@pdfme/generator, chart.js, lcov-result-merger, and vitest), and added new test scripts.
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx Introduced a comprehensive test suite for the Avatar component, covering various rendering scenarios and error handling.
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Modified the Avatar component to allow optional name, added customUrl property, and updated avatar generation logic.
tsconfig.json Added an exclude property to specify directories and files to be excluded from TypeScript compilation.
vitest.config.js Created a new configuration file for Vitest, specifying plugins, test settings, and coverage reporting configurations.

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor, test

Suggested reviewers

  • pranshugupta54
  • varshith257
  • AVtheking

🐇 In the code we play,
With tests and scripts all day,
Dependencies updated,
New paths are created,
Vitest leads the way!
Hopping through code, hooray! 🐇

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@NishantSinghhhhh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80fffe8 and 1e98f8d.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
vitest.config.js (1)

14-34: Consider adding minimum coverage thresholds

The test configuration is well-structured, but could benefit from defining minimum coverage thresholds to maintain code quality standards.

Add coverage thresholds to ensure maintaining test coverage:

  coverage: {
    enabled: true,
    provider: 'istanbul',
    reportsDirectory: './coverage/vitest',
+   thresholds: {
+     lines: 80,
+     functions: 80,
+     branches: 80,
+     statements: 80
+   },
    exclude: [
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

Line range hint 18-31: Update JSDoc to include new properties

The component's JSDoc comments are missing documentation for the new customUrl and loading properties.

Add documentation for new props:

  /**
   * A component that generates and displays an avatar based on the provided name.
   * The avatar is generated using the DiceBear library with the initials style.
   *
   * @param name - The name used to generate the avatar.
   * @param alt - Alternative text for the avatar image.
   * @param size - Size of the avatar image.
   * @param avatarStyle - Custom CSS class for the avatar image.
   * @param dataTestId - Data-testid attribute for testing purposes.
   * @param radius - Radius of the avatar corners.
+  * @param customUrl - Optional URL to use instead of generating an avatar
+  * @param loading - Optional loading state for the avatar
   *
   * @returns JSX.Element - The rendered avatar image component.
   */
package.json (1)

Line range hint 116-158: Ensure test dependencies are in sync

The testing-related dependencies look good, but there are some considerations:

  1. @testing-library/react is pinned to version ^16.0.1 which is quite old
  2. @types/jest is still included despite migrating to Vitest

Consider these updates:

-    "@testing-library/react": "^16.0.1",
+    "@testing-library/react": "^14.0.0",
-    "@types/jest": "^26.0.24",
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (2)

37-90: Consider adding snapshot tests

While the current tests cover functionality well, adding snapshot tests would help catch unintended visual changes.

Add this test:

test('matches snapshot', () => {
  const { container } = render(
    <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}>
      <BrowserRouter>
        <Provider store={store}>
          <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}>
            <Avatar name="John Doe" size={64} />
          </I18nextProvider>
        </Provider>
      </BrowserRouter>
    </MockedProvider>
  );
  expect(container).toMatchSnapshot();
});

129-138: Add specific size validation tests

The invalid sizes test could be more specific about the expected fallback size.

-      expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('width');  // Expect the fallback size of 128
-      expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('height'); // Expect the fallback size of 128
+      const defaultSize = '128';
+      expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('width', defaultSize);
+      expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('height', defaultSize);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d1f1f0 and 99d272b.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • package.json (5 hunks)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (3 hunks)
  • tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
  • vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tsconfig.json (1)

21-22: LGTM! Appropriate TypeScript exclusions

The exclusions are well-configured for the Vitest migration, properly excluding build artifacts and test configuration.

vitest.config.js (1)

7-13: LGTM! Well-configured plugins for React testing

The plugin configuration is appropriate for React testing with Vitest:

  • React plugin for JSX support
  • Minimal node polyfills (events only)
  • TypeScript path resolution
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

65-66: LGTM! Good accessibility improvement

Adding explicit height and width attributes helps prevent layout shifts and improves accessibility.

package.json (2)

78-80: LGTM: Test scripts properly configured

The new Vitest scripts are well-structured:

  • test:vitest: For CI/CD pipelines
  • test:vitest:watch: For development
  • test:vitest:coverage: For coverage reporting

Line range hint 20-43: Verify version compatibility of core dependencies

The changes include version updates and new dependencies. Some concerns:

  1. Downgrading @mui/x-date-pickers from ^7.22.1 to ^7.18.0 might introduce compatibility issues
  2. Adding chart.js and @pdfme/generator increases the bundle size significantly
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (2)

1-35: LGTM: Well-structured test setup

The test setup is comprehensive with proper mocking of dependencies and store.


92-114: LGTM: Good error handling test coverage

The helper function and error handling tests are well implemented.

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

45-52: Fix indentation in customUrl validation block

The indentation in the customUrl validation block is inconsistent.

  if (customUrl) {
    try {
      new URL(customUrl);
      return customUrl;
    } catch (e) {
      console.warn('Invalid custom URL provided to Avatar component');
    }
  }
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 46-46: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 50-50: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (2)

93-105: Add return type to renderAvatar helper function

The helper function lacks a TypeScript return type annotation.

- const renderAvatar = (props = {}) => {
+ const renderAvatar = (props = {}): ReturnType<typeof render> => {
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 93-93: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)


[error] 95-95: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 96-96: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 97-97: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 98-98: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 99-99: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


129-138: Enhance invalid size test assertions

The invalid size tests could be more specific about the expected fallback behavior.

  test(`falls back to default size when invalid size ${size} is provided`, () => {
    renderAvatar({ name: 'Test User', size });

    const avatarElement = screen.getByAltText('Dummy Avatar');
-   expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('width');
-   expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('height');
+   expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('width', '128');
+   expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('height', '128');
  });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 99d272b and 5ef4e30.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx

[error] 46-46: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 47-47: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 48-48: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 49-49: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 50-50: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 70-70: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 71-71: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 72-72: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 73-73: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 74-78: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 93-93: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)


[error] 95-95: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 96-96: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 97-97: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 98-98: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 99-99: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 170-170: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 172-172: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 175-175: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 178-180: Delete ⏎··⏎··

(prettier/prettier)

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx

[error] 40-41: Delete

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 41-41: 'src' is assigned a value but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 41-41: 'setSrc' is assigned a value but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 46-46: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 50-50: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (1)

164-178: LGTM! Good implementation of network error handling test

The test case properly simulates network errors and verifies the fallback behavior.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 170-170: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 172-172: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 175-175: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

43-50: Enhance error handling for invalid custom URLs

The URL validation is good, but consider:

  1. Adding error details to the warning message
  2. Potentially notifying parent components of validation failures
    if (customUrl) {
      try {
        new URL(customUrl);
        return customUrl;
      } catch (e) {
-       console.warn('Invalid custom URL provided to Avatar component');
+       console.warn(`Invalid custom URL provided to Avatar component: ${customUrl}`, e);
+       // Consider adding: onError?.(e);
      }
    }
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 44-44: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-45: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 46-46: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 48-48: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (1)

134-136: Enhance size fallback tests

The test should assert the specific fallback size value instead of just checking for the presence of width/height attributes.

-     expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('width'); // Expect the fallback size of 128
-     expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('height'); // Expect the fallback size of 128
+     const expectedFallback = '128';
+     expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('width', expectedFallback);
+     expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttribute('height', expectedFallback);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ef4e30 and 80fffe8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx

[error] 46-46: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 47-47: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 48-48: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 49-49: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 50-50: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 70-70: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 71-71: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 72-72: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 73-73: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 74-78: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 93-93: Missing return type on function.

(@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type)


[error] 95-95: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 96-96: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 97-97: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 98-98: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 99-99: 'React' must be in scope when using JSX

(react/react-in-jsx-scope)


[error] 163-166: Delete ⏎⏎··⏎

(prettier/prettier)

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx

[error] 40-41: Delete ⏎··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-45: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 46-46: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 48-48: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (1)

53-56: Add fallback for undefined size

The size prop is used directly without a fallback value, which could cause rendering issues when size is undefined.

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.spec.tsx (2)

1-35: LGTM! Well-structured test setup

The test setup is comprehensive with proper mocking of dependencies and providers.


153-162: Add network error handling tests

The custom URL tests should include network error scenarios.

src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 2, 2024
@NishantSinghhhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

NishantSinghhhhh commented Dec 2, 2024

@palisadoes

My PR is failing due to the test case [Checks if sensitive files have been changed without authorization]. I need to add dependencies like vitest to package.json, and this change is essential. How can I ensure this test passes?

Additionally, I am unable to run npm run lint:fix on my machine. It throws an error. How can I resolve these issues?
Screenshot from 2024-12-02 20-52-25

can you please tell me what is the problem in here

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (3)

43-50: Fix formatting issues.

The indentation is inconsistent in the customUrl handling block.

  if (customUrl) {
    try {
      new URL(customUrl);
-         return customUrl;
+     return customUrl;
    } catch (e) {
      console.warn('Invalid custom URL provided to Avatar component');
    }
  }
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 44-44: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-45: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 46-46: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 48-48: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


43-50: Enhance error handling for customUrl validation.

The current error handling could be more informative and provide better debugging context.

  if (customUrl) {
    try {
      new URL(customUrl);
      return customUrl;
    } catch (e) {
-     console.warn('Invalid custom URL provided to Avatar component');
+     console.warn(`Invalid custom URL provided to Avatar component: ${customUrl}`, e);
    }
  }
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 44-44: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-45: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 46-46: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 48-48: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


Missing dependencies in useMemo hook

The useMemo hook's dependency array is missing customUrl and radius which are used within the memoized function. Looking at other usages of useMemo across the codebase, all dependencies used within the memoized functions are consistently included in their respective dependency arrays.

- }, [name, size]);
+ }, [name, size, customUrl, radius]);
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 42-57: Verify memoization dependencies.

The useMemo hook's dependency array only includes [name, size], but customUrl and radius are also used within the memoized function.

- }, [name, size]);
+ }, [name, size, customUrl, radius]);
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of useMemo in the codebase to verify consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'useMemo($_, [$_])' 

Length of output: 12640

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 40-41: Delete ⏎··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-45: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 46-46: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 48-48: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 80fffe8 and 1e98f8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx

[error] 40-41: Delete ⏎··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ···

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-45: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 46-46: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 47-47: 'e' is defined but never used.

(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)


[error] 48-48: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Avatar/Avatar.tsx (2)

31-31: LGTM! Props handling looks good.

The default value for the optional name prop and the addition of customUrl are well implemented.

Also applies to: 38-38


68-69: LGTM! Consistent size handling.

The explicit height and width attributes with fallbacks match the avatar creation size, ensuring consistent rendering.

@palisadoes palisadoes added the ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files label Dec 2, 2024
@NishantSinghhhhh NishantSinghhhhh changed the base branch from main to develop December 3, 2024 07:42
@NishantSinghhhhh NishantSinghhhhh dismissed coderabbitai[bot]’s stale review December 3, 2024 07:42

The base branch was changed.

@NishantSinghhhhh NishantSinghhhhh changed the base branch from develop to main December 3, 2024 07:43
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes removed their request for review December 3, 2024 16:34
@NishantSinghhhhh
Copy link
Contributor Author

NishantSinghhhhh commented Dec 4, 2024

@palisadoes , I just wanted to ask , if I can add few tests that i feel will be good

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Closing. You need to be making your changes using the most current version of the develop-postgres branch.

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ignore-sensitive-files-pr The contributor has a legitimate reason for editiing protected files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants